USA: 3 cents 1887, km95, overdate 7/6 or 87/86

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5336.html



Comments?

add ) in box on the left and maybe add "Proof only" to it.

Everything is possible, is this what you want?



or do you want the proof only in the brackets?

That's good.

Coin page and year line changes:

I don't think "exist" is needed, if I have understood it right, then the proof is ALWAYS with overdate, or have I missed out on something?

I had the same thought. SCWC implies all proofs are overdate. The Red Book shows 1887 with mintage for proofs (2,960) and on a new line the 7/6 Proof with a note that mintage is included in the line above (i.e. in the 2960 "regular" proofs). I figured I'd play it safe but if there's a third reference that says all proofs are overdate I can change it.

And now that I said that, I just saw where PCGS says all proofs are overdates so I'll change it to "Proof, overdate 7/6 or 87/86"

Actually it's always 87/86, but it really doesn't matter since the 8's are the same size....

I'm not sure where I got "7/6 or 87/86" from.

Citação: "rsirian1"​I'm not sure where I got "7/6 or 87/86" from.
​
​

​From me, no doubt, so stick to it, I'm still the opinion, that often the American specialists see things..... and I still wonder, if somehow they have the dies laying around in Philidelphia? Specially the overdates are often more than doubtfull, you'll see as we progrees.