Combining/Deleting Joachimsthaler Pages

N#92644

N#92645

N#92646

There's really no reason for there to be three pages when they're just for small lettering changes. This type has dozens of lettering variations + other mintmarks and varieties, and it would be ridiculous to have a page for each of those when they're all added. The second and third pages linked could probably just be removed from the catalog as no users have them. Right now I'm attempting to catalogue as many varieties as possible and will put them under one page.

Thanks

Let's get a viewpoint from Jarcek since this is his area of expertise.

I tend to agree that with no major design changes, only lettering, we can use one listing,

However, if other catalogs recognize the lettering differences as subtypes, we should at least capture these in the comments, and maybe also as different date lines.

I agree but poke @Jarcek 

Sure thing, now we have possibility to include photos per yearline. We can merge without losing any information, if we include pictures on yearlines and add variety lettering on yearline comments/comments section.

Only this coin has users N#92644 so I would make it “primary” page. I would like to coordinate, @AgIsSilver - are you preparing some changes to those pages?

Slowly recording varieties and will put them on the ‘main’ page once completed. It's tedious but I'll have this done within two days. I'm noting lettering, lettering separators (rosette/ring and dot/colon), mintmastermark, other design differences. It will be a lot on one page, but I'll make it easy to follow. It could maybe even be split up into different pages from there, but in a way that makes more sense than the current three pages. 

Ok, so I will wait, thank you!

Once done, please let me know which yearlines are for those two “types” we have as separate duplicate pages, I will move their pictures there.

Bump?

Poke @AgIsSilver ?

Without answers, I will archive this request. There is no immediate need for action.