Display counts of all compositions and types instead of "Others"

5 publicações • visualizado 65 vezes

Esta mensagem tem como objetivo: sugerindo uma ideia para melhorar o Numista

Estado: Aberto
Votos positivos: 12
Votos negativos: 0

Pretty simple and straightforward suggestion, I think it would be better to simply display counts of all the different compositions and types in a collection instead of showing just the ones you have the most of and “Others” for everything else. This would allow people to at a glance see how many coins or notes of the more obscure materials or types they have. You already need to scroll anyway to see all the displayed ones, so implementing this would simply make the list to scroll through longer and get rid of the “Others” count, it wouldnt add any additional clutter to the my collection page, I dont see a downside to that because frankly who cares how many “others” they have.

 

I like this idea, It would also help show over/under representation in all areas of the collection for those who like a well rounded collection. 

I also agree, would be nice to have a more in depth view of my collection !

I agree, or if not all metals, always count at least gold and platinum.

 

You may have only a couple of gold coins, but they could be worth more than a thousand of your nickel and aluminium coins. That shouldn't be “other”.

₱o$₮ag€ $₮am₱$ a₹€ mo₹€ £€₲i₮ima₮€ a$ a ƒo₹m oƒ ¢u₹₹€nc¥ ₮ha₦ ₮h€ €₦₮i₹€ "¢oi₦" ₱₹odu¢₮io₦ oƒ ₦au₹u o₹ ₦iu€. ••• £€$ ₮im฿₹€$-₱o$₮€ $o₦₮ ₱£u$ £é₲i₮im€$ €₦ ₮a₦t qu'o฿j€₮$ mo₦é₮ai₹€$ qu€ £a ₱₹odu¢₮io₦ €₦₮iè₹€ d€ «mo₦₦ai€$» d€ ₦au₹u ou d€ ₦iu€.

Camerinvs

 

You may have only a couple of gold coins, but they could be worth more than a thousand of your nickel and aluminium coins. That shouldn't be “other”.

Great argument.

And who can be against it? Upvotes are rising quickly.

» Política do fórum

O fuso horário usado é UTC+2:00.
O horário atual é 22:44.