Can anyone provide photos of a 2016 WITH PM mintmark?

I don't have an example of it myself, so wondering if there are indeed any of the 2016 variants that have the PM mintmark at all. I only have the AA, AC and BA. But all are without the PM mintmark.

I'd love to see if anyone does have any of the 2016 letter variants with PM mintmark that they could photograph and share.

Yes, I also think that these coins could not exists at all. Maybe AA was issued with PM but rather the next ones were only without mintmark. Howev, some users claims to have it - this will be probably longer story to check it deeper.

Can you post here your photo of AC without PM 2016?

@MMowiec isn´t the example picture of the 2016 AC already present  rather a CA based on the placement? In other examples it is always read top down …

Yes, I think so… this could be AC /CA dependenend on what side you are reading from to… same AB/BA mentioned on the other topic that BA is missing… I want to see the AC example from the user who opened this topic just to confirm that this is the same version (or different) as in the example.

I will do the review of these coins but have a limited time now, I'm doing this chronoligically. Currently I'm reviewing the IOM circulation coins from '80.

Yes I’ll post mine in a sec

MMowiec

Yes, I think so… this could be AC /CA dependenend on what side you are reading from to… same AB/BA mentioned on the other topic that BA is missing… I want to see the AC example from the user who opened this topic just to confirm that this is the same version (or different) as in the example.

 

I will do the review of these coins but have a limited time now, I'm doing this chronoligically. Currently I'm reviewing the IOM circulation coins from '80.

Thats my AC one above.

Then here’s my BA.

Curious Collector

 

Then here’s my BA.

Be sure everyone is on the same page. If you read from left to right it's BA, if you read from top to bottom it's AB. Normally we describe lettering from top to bottom. I don't know how it's done with the mintmarks but why should that be different?

Essor Prof

Curious Collector

 

Then here’s my BA.

Be sure everyone is on the same page. If you read from left to right it's BA, if you read from top to bottom it's AB. Normally we describe lettering from top to bottom. I don't know how it's done with the mintmarks but why should that be different?

 

 

Ah ok, so did I misidentify it?

The only 2016 coin I have with a PM is the TT 50 Pence. (I don't have any crown or precious metal issues.) Every other than that 50 P coin every example of a 2016 circulating issue I've seen a picture of doesn't have a PM.

Curious Collector

 

Ah ok, so did I misidentify it?

Maybe. It depends. But we'll work it out. It's important we all look at it the same way (top to bottom or left to right). Most logical to me is top to bottom because we describe all the other lettering that way but let's see what the referee says. It's possible there's a lot of confusion because of interpretation and that shouldn't happy. There's only 1 possible rule.

That's why pictures are important.

SCWC (Numismaster) does it alphabetically. So does Ucoin.

This is AB on Ucoin

This is AC on Ucoin

rsirian1

SCWC (Numismaster) does it alphabetically. So does Ucoin.

If they do it alphabetically, a BA can never exist.

I was stating how they did it for this coin and 2016 only, not universally.  Alphabetically is also how Numista currently does it, for this coin.

Curiously, Ucoin for 2014 has an AB and a BA just like Numista.

Here's 2014 AB

and here's 2014 BA

I suspect that's why Numista has both variants also.