My 4 Sols 2 Deniers coin (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces7760.html) is an overstruck piece with no visible date, as you can see in https://en.numista.com/forum/topic78018.html. While it's rather worn and some of the original letterings are still there to be seen, the rim seems to be mostly intact, which means the year was not there in the first place. Unless I'm missing something here, that is, of course. Any opinions? If it really had been non-dated from the start, would it be possible to add a new issuing year to the page as ND?
Hm... I believe that is just the overstruck-idness (?) that is making it appear like it is a No Date coin.
The actual date should be below the bust, but that is where remanence of the top FR ET is appearing. Additionally, there is a 9 appearing atop the R of REX, making me think this coin was at least struck three times. But if there is a random 9 on that coin, that would be evidence of there having once been a date, meaning the No Date is a result of the error rather than the coin having been originally struck like that.
Oh. Didn’t know it could have been struck more than twice, honestly, but that makes a lot of sense. Maybe the rim is not of this 4 Sols 4 Deniers but of what it was struck on, then?
